http://seattleshortsaleblog.com/2009/11/02/dangerous-myth-lenders-cannot-pursue-a-deficiency-judgement-after-a-non-judicial-foreclosure/ ...breezing through short sales like a short sail Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:13:13 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://seattleshortsaleblog.com/2009/11/02/dangerous-myth-lenders-cannot-pursue-a-deficiency-judgement-after-a-non-judicial-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-1922 James Monroe Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:26:06 +0000 http://seattleshortsaleblog.com/?p=81#comment-1922 Beverly Shortsale helps us they were able to do a shortsale in less than 3 months save my house and everything worked out check them out at www.beverlyshortsale.com Beverly Shortsale helps us they were able to do a shortsale in less than 3 months save my house and everything worked out check them out at http://www.beverlyshortsale.com

]]> http://seattleshortsaleblog.com/2009/11/02/dangerous-myth-lenders-cannot-pursue-a-deficiency-judgement-after-a-non-judicial-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-1677 kevin_kim Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:26:13 +0000 http://seattleshortsaleblog.com/?p=81#comment-1677 Would you agree that the non-foreclosing lender may sue for a breach of contract based on the promissory note? This possibility alone justifies the homeowners need to carry out extensive due dilligence prior to allowing their property to enter foreclosure, even non judicial Would you agree that the non-foreclosing lender may sue for a breach of contract based on the promissory note? This possibility alone justifies the homeowners need to carry out extensive due dilligence prior to allowing their property to enter foreclosure, even non judicial

]]> http://seattleshortsaleblog.com/2009/11/02/dangerous-myth-lenders-cannot-pursue-a-deficiency-judgement-after-a-non-judicial-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-1672 Jeff Taraday Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:58:40 +0000 http://seattleshortsaleblog.com/?p=81#comment-1672 I think you are not be entirely clear about some key points of the Sarich case. That case involved three different deeds of trust and their corresponding obligations. With respect to the obligations that do in fact go into non-judicial foreclosure, it is true that those debts are satisfied through that process. But it does get more complicated with multiple DOTs. I think you are not be entirely clear about some key points of the Sarich case. That case involved three different deeds of trust and their corresponding obligations. With respect to the obligations that do in fact go into non-judicial foreclosure, it is true that those debts are satisfied through that process. But it does get more complicated with multiple DOTs.

]]>